Ethan Quinn vs Borna Coric Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

How crucial is second serve performance in determining the outcome of a tennis match? Over the past six months, Coric has managed to win a respectable 44.33% of points on their second serve, while Quinn has outpaced them, securing 47.69%. Such figures carry significant weight in match predictions as they often indicate which player can sustain longer rallies and control the play even when their first serve falters.

Delving deeper into return game statistics, recent performances reveal that Quinn has a slight edge in winning 45.1% of their opponent's second serve points compared to Coric's 43.53%. When examining the first serve returns, Quinn continues to lead with 24.88% over Coric's 22.39%. These nuances not only aid in evaluating this head-to-head match-up but also highlight who might hold the upper hand when breaking serve.

How well do these players handle pressure situations? Coric has shown consistency in saving 57.71% of breakpoints, a vital statistic when predicting potential in-game momentum shifts. Meanwhile, Quinn has saved 52.9% of breakpoints, suggesting a slightly less resilient defense under pressure but still formidable enough to pose a threat.

Analyzing their overall performance, Coric has claimed victory in 56.14% of matches over the last year (W/L 32/25), while Quinn has a slightly higher win rate of 57.69% (W/L 45/33). Such data offers insight into their general form and effectiveness across different levels of competition.

Examining surface preferences, both players excel on indoor hard courts, boasting a win rate of 61%. However, Coric struggles more on grass with a 41% win rate, whereas Quinn finds clay to be his least favorable surface, winning 45% of matches played.

When focusing on player levels, Coric has dominated at the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K level over the past year, winning an impressive 75% of matches (W/L 21/7). Quinn, meanwhile, has played more matches at this level, with a 57.14% win rate (W/L 28/21), underscoring the differences in competition levels they have encountered.

A glance at their opponent's quality shows that Coric has faced stronger competition, playing against opponents with an average rank of 159.84 compared to Quinn’s average of 234.55. This discrepancy might suggest a more tested mettle for Coric.

In the realm of deciding sets, a critical factor for live betting insights, Coric is not as successful with a 47% win rate, while Quinn edges ahead by securing 58% of deciding sets, suggesting a knack for closing out tight encounters.

Lastly, assessing break point conversion can be telling for in-game dynamics. Coric has converted 26.56% of breakpoints, slightly surpassing Quinn, who stands at a 25.54% conversion rate. While this stat alone may not dictate a match outcome, it highlights which player might capitalize more effectively under high-stakes scenarios.

Overall, while both players showcase varied strengths, Quinn's slightly superior second serve performance, consistency in deciding sets, and adeptness at converting crucial points suggest a marginal advantage. Considering these aspects, Quinn emerges as the probable favorite in this matchup.